ÇÐȸÁö/³í¹®Åõ°í

ȯ°æºÐ¼®ÇÐȸÁö 'ȯ°æºÐ¼®°ú µ¶¼ºº¸°Ç(ISSN 2672-0175, eISSN 2672-1139)'Àº ȯ°æµ¶¼ºº¸°ÇÇÐȸ¿Í °øµ¿À¸·Î ¹ß°£Çϸç,

2019³âºÎÅÍ open access·Î ÀüȯÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó http://jeaht.org/ ¿¡¼­ Àü¹®À» ¿­¶÷ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÇÐȸÁö/³í¹®Åõ°í

Åä¾ç½Ã·áÀÇ PCBs ºÐ¼®¹ý ºñ±³

ÀÛ¼ºÀÚ
±è±³±Ù
³â,±Ç,È£
2002,5,2
Á¶È¸
1535
The three different methods(Korea:I, EPA:II, Japan:III) of PCBs analytical methods were compared using 62 kinds of PCBs isomers. To do this, the cleanup process considered before proceeding the established each methods. The 2,3,4,4',5-PeCB(IUPAC No. 114) showed the lowest recovery, but 2,2¡®,3,4,5¡¯-PeCB(IUPAC No. 87), 2,2',3,3',4,4',5-HpCB(IUPAC No. 170) and 2,2¡®,3,3¡¯,4,4¡®,5,5¡¯ -OcCB(IUPAC No. 194) were represented the recoveries over 120% in 62 PCBs isomers. The recovery ranges following the number of Cl were obtained 68.54%(8 Cl)¢¦95.69%(10 Cl) for Korea, 41.50% (1 Cl)¢¦101.00%(10 Cl) for USA, and 68.30%(8 Cl)¢¦89.53%(4 Cl) for Japan. Also, the average recoveries of 14 kinds coplanar-PCBs were obtained 79.69% for method I, 88.05% for method II and 73.38% for method III.